Q3481.The following sentence has been divided into parts. One of them contains an error. Select the part that contains the error from the given options.
Neither the students nor the teachers (1)/ were aware that the schedule (2)/ for the annual function (3)/ have been changed by the principal. (4)
- A(1)
- B(2)
- C(3)
- D(4)
Show answer
Concept: A singular subject takes a singular verb; with 'neither…nor' the verb agrees with the nearer subject.
- Part (1)–(2): 'Neither the students nor the teachers were' – nearer subject 'teachers' is plural, so 'were' is correct.
- In part (4), the subject is 'the schedule' (singular).
- 'have been changed' must be 'had been changed' (past sequence after 'were aware').
- Hence part (4) contains the error.
Yaad rakhein: Find the real subject of each verb – here 'have' belongs to 'the schedule', not to 'students/teachers'.
Answer: (D) (4)
अवधारणा: एकवचन कर्ता के साथ एकवचन क्रिया; 'neither…nor' में क्रिया पास वाले कर्ता के अनुसार।
- भाग (1)–(2): 'Neither the students nor the teachers were' – पास वाला कर्ता 'teachers' बहुवचन है, अतः 'were' सही।
- भाग (4) का कर्ता 'the schedule' एकवचन है।
- 'have been changed' की जगह 'had been changed' होना चाहिए (भूतकाल 'were aware' के बाद)।
- अतः भाग (4) में त्रुटि है।
याद रखें: हर क्रिया का असली कर्ता ढूँढें – 'have' का कर्ता 'the schedule' है।
उत्तर: (D) (4)
Q3482.Choose the correctly spelt word.
- AMyriad
- BMarreid
- CMiddel
- DMarder
Show answer
Concept: Pick the word with standard spelling.
- Myriad (a very large number) – correct.
- Correct forms of the others: Married, Middle, Murder.
Trick: Look for common words misspelt (Middel, Marder) – eliminate them first.
Answer: (A) Myriad
अवधारणा: मानक वर्तनी वाला शब्द चुनें।
- Myriad (असंख्य) – सही।
- बाकी के सही रूप: Married, Middle, Murder।
ट्रिक: आम शब्दों की गलत वर्तनी (Middel, Marder) पहले हटाएँ।
उत्तर: (A) Myriad
Q3483.Choose the correctly spelt word.
- AElastik
- BEcholalia
- CEgoisht
- DEconomicel
Show answer
Concept: Pick the correctly spelt word.
- Echolalia (automatic repetition of another person's words) – correct.
- Corrections: Elastic, Egoist, Economical.
Trick: Unusual letters like 'k' in 'Elastik' or 'sh' in 'Egoisht' reveal errors at once.
Answer: (B) Echolalia
अवधारणा: सही वर्तनी वाला शब्द चुनें।
- Echolalia (दूसरे के शब्द दोहराना) – सही।
- सही रूप: Elastic, Egoist, Economical।
ट्रिक: 'Elastik' में 'k' या 'Egoisht' में 'sh' जैसी अनोखी वर्तनी तुरंत गलती दिखाती है।
उत्तर: (B) Echolalia
Q3484.Choose the one-word substitute for the below sentence.
He openly criticised the government's decisions and refused to support its official policies.
- AActivist
- BDissident
- CAgitator
- DProtestor
Show answer
Concept: Dissident = a person who openly opposes official policy, especially of a government.
- The sentence stresses criticising the government and rejecting its policies → dissident.
- Activist = campaigns for a cause; Agitator = stirs up unrest; Protestor = takes part in a protest.
Yaad rakhein: Dissent (noun) = disagreement with official views.
Answer: (B) Dissident
अवधारणा: Dissident = सरकार की आधिकारिक नीति का खुला विरोधी।
- वाक्य में सरकार की आलोचना और नीतियों का अस्वीकार → dissident।
- Activist = किसी उद्देश्य हेतु अभियान; Agitator = अशांति भड़काने वाला; Protestor = प्रदर्शनकारी।
याद रखें: Dissent = आधिकारिक मत से असहमति।
उत्तर: (B) Dissident
Q3485.Choose the correct one-word substitute for:
The quality of having an exaggerated sense of one's own importance or abilities.
- APrudence
- BArrogance
- CHumility
- DModerate
Show answer
Concept: Arrogance = an exaggerated sense of one's own importance or abilities.
- Humility is its opposite; Prudence means wise caution.
- 'Moderate' is an adjective/verb, not a quality noun.
Yaad rakhein: Related words: haughtiness, conceit, hubris.
Answer: (B) Arrogance
अवधारणा: Arrogance = अपनी योग्यता/महत्त्व का बढ़ा-चढ़ा भाव, घमंड।
- Humility (विनम्रता) इसका विलोम; Prudence = समझदारी।
- 'Moderate' गुणवाचक संज्ञा नहीं है।
याद रखें: समान शब्द: haughtiness, conceit, hubris।
उत्तर: (B) Arrogance
Q3486.Choose the right collocation:
The report provides a ____ analysis of the existing healthcare framework.
- Athoroughgoing
- Bthrough-going
- Cgo-thorough
- Dthrough-go
Show answer
Concept: Thoroughgoing = complete and detailed.
- 'A thoroughgoing analysis' = a full, detailed study.
- 'Through-going', 'go-thorough', 'through-go' are not valid English words.
Trick: Don't confuse 'thorough' (complete) with 'through' (from one side to the other).
Answer: (A) thoroughgoing
अवधारणा: Thoroughgoing = पूर्ण और विस्तृत।
- 'A thoroughgoing analysis' = पूरा, विस्तृत विश्लेषण।
- बाकी रूप अंग्रेज़ी में मान्य शब्द नहीं।
ट्रिक: 'thorough' (पूर्ण) और 'through' (आर-पार) में भ्रम न करें।
उत्तर: (A) thoroughgoing
Q3487.Select the most appropriate option to fill in the blank.
The proposal ____ was initially dismissed, later gained widespread approval.
- Awho
- Bwhich
- Cthat
- Dwhom
Show answer
Concept: For things use 'which/that'; for people 'who/whom'.
- 'The proposal' is a thing → who/whom are out.
- The clause adds extra (non-defining) information, so 'which' is used: 'The proposal, which was initially dismissed, later gained…'
Trick: Non-defining clause (set off by commas) never takes 'that'.
Answer: (B) which
अवधारणा: वस्तु के लिए 'which/that', व्यक्ति के लिए 'who/whom'।
- 'The proposal' वस्तु है → who/whom हटाएँ।
- यह उपवाक्य अतिरिक्त जानकारी देता है, इसलिए 'which' आएगा।
ट्रिक: अल्पविराम वाले (non-defining) उपवाक्य में 'that' नहीं आता।
उत्तर: (B) which
Q3488.Select the option that expresses the given sentence in the Active/Passive voice.
Did the board approve the company's revised financial policy?
- AWas the company's revised financial policy approved from the board?
- BHas the company's revised financial policy been approved by the board?
- CWas the company's revised financial policy approved by the board?
- DIs the company's revised financial policy being approved by the board?
Show answer
Concept: Did + V1 (active) → Was/Were + subject + V3 + by…? (passive).
- Object 'the company's revised financial policy' becomes the subject.
- Passive: Was the company's revised financial policy approved by the board?
- (A) wrong preposition 'from'; (B), (D) change the tense.
Trick: Keep the tense; only 'by' introduces the doer.
Answer: (C) Was the company's revised financial policy approved by the board?
अवधारणा: Did + V1 → Was/Were + कर्ता + V3 + by…?
- कर्म 'the company's revised financial policy' कर्ता बनेगा।
- Passive: Was the company's revised financial policy approved by the board?
- (A) में 'from' गलत; (B), (D) में काल बदला।
ट्रिक: काल वही रखें; कर्ता से पहले केवल 'by'।
उत्तर: (C) Was the company's revised financial policy approved by the board?
Q3489.Select the sentence in which the homonym of the given word is used.
Word: Crosier
Meaning: a plant structure with a coiled end.
- AThe gardener pruned the emerging crosier of the fern.
- BThe bishop carried an ornate silver crosier in the procession.
- CThe spiral crosier is a beautiful example of nature's geometry.
- DThe botanical crosier unfurled as the temperature rose.
Show answer
Concept: A homonym uses the same word with a different meaning.
- Given meaning: coiled tip of a young fern (plant).
- Other meaning: a bishop's hooked staff – used in (B).
- (A), (C), (D) still use the plant sense.
Trick: Pick the sentence whose context (bishop, procession) is far from the given meaning.
Answer: (B) The bishop carried an ornate silver crosier in the procession.
अवधारणा: समनाम = वही शब्द, अलग अर्थ।
- दिया अर्थ: फर्न का कुंडलित सिरा (पौधा)।
- दूसरा अर्थ: बिशप की मुड़ी हुई छड़ी – (B) में।
- (A), (C), (D) में पौधे वाला अर्थ ही है।
ट्रिक: जिस वाक्य का संदर्भ (बिशप, जुलूस) दिए अर्थ से बिल्कुल अलग हो, वही।
उत्तर: (B) The bishop carried an ornate silver crosier in the procession.
Q3490.Select the option that expresses the given sentence in the Active/Passive voice.
The findings had been suppressed by the committee for political reasons.
- AThe committee had suppressed the findings for political reasons.
- BThe committee suppressed the findings for political reasons.
- CThe findings were suppressed by the committee for political reasons.
- DThe committee was suppressing the findings for political reasons.
Show answer
Concept: had been + V3 (passive) → had + V3 (active).
- Doer 'the committee' becomes the subject.
- Active: The committee had suppressed the findings for political reasons.
- (B) simple past, (C) still passive, (D) past continuous.
Trick: Match the helping verb: 'had been' → 'had'.
Answer: (A) The committee had suppressed the findings for political reasons.
अवधारणा: had been + V3 → had + V3।
- कर्ता 'the committee' आगे आएगा।
- Active: The committee had suppressed the findings for political reasons.
- (B) सामान्य भूत, (C) कर्मवाच्य ही, (D) अपूर्ण भूत।
ट्रिक: सहायक क्रिया मिलाएँ: 'had been' → 'had'।
उत्तर: (A) The committee had suppressed the findings for political reasons.
Q3491.Select the most appropriate option to substitute the underline/Bold segment in the given sentence.
The tourists are going to abroad for a cultural exchange program.
- Aare going abroad
- Bare going for abroad
- Care going in abroad
- Dare going towards abroad
Show answer
Concept: 'Abroad' is an adverb, so no preposition comes before it.
- 'Going to abroad' is wrong.
- Correct: 'The tourists are going abroad…'
Yaad rakhein: Same rule: go home, go upstairs, go abroad (no 'to').
Answer: (A) are going abroad
अवधारणा: 'Abroad' क्रियाविशेषण है, इसलिए इससे पहले preposition नहीं आता।
- 'going to abroad' गलत।
- सही: 'The tourists are going abroad…'
याद रखें: इसी तरह: go home, go upstairs, go abroad (बिना 'to')।
उत्तर: (A) are going abroad
Q3492.Select the most appropriate option to substitute the underline/Bold segment in the given sentence.
She is looking forward to meet you.
- Ais looking forward for meeting you
- Bis looking forward to meeting you
- Cis looking forward about meeting you
- Dis looking forward meet you
Show answer
Concept: In 'look forward to', 'to' is a preposition → verb + ing.
- 'looking forward to meet' is wrong.
- Correct: 'She is looking forward to meeting you.'
Yaad rakhein: Same pattern: object to, used to (accustomed), committed to, with a view to + V-ing.
Answer: (B) is looking forward to meeting you
अवधारणा: 'look forward to' में 'to' preposition है → क्रिया + ing।
- 'looking forward to meet' गलत।
- सही: 'She is looking forward to meeting you.'
याद रखें: इसी तरह: object to, be used to, committed to, with a view to + V-ing।
उत्तर: (B) is looking forward to meeting you
Directions (Qs. 93-97): Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.
Science, as both a method and an institution, occupies a paradoxical position within modern society. It promises objectivity, progress, and mastery over nature, yet it simultaneously engenders profound ethical dilemmas. The relentless pursuit of innovation often outpaces moral reflection, leaving humanity to confront consequences it is ill-prepared to manage. From genetic modification to artificial intelligence, scientific advancement expands the boundaries of what can be done, while offering little guidance on what should be done. This widening gap between capability and conscience underscores the need for an ethical framework that evolves in tandem with discovery. Historically, science has been regarded as a neutral enterprise — its value determined by human application. However, this notion of neutrality is increasingly untenable in a world where data, algorithms, and biotechnologies directly shape social realities. The scientist no longer functions solely as an observer but as an active agent of transformation, capable of altering both the environment and the human condition itself. Consequently, the question of responsibility becomes inseparable from the act of inquiry. Ethics, then, cannot remain external to science; it must be integrated within its very methodology. The development of nuclear weapons, surveillance technologies, and environmental exploitation has demonstrated that knowledge divorced from moral accountability leads to existential peril. In this sense, ethical deliberation is not an impediment to progress but its precondition. The challenge lies in reconciling the empirical rigor of science with the normative demands of ethics — an endeavor that requires humility, dialogue, and an awareness of science’s sociopolitical embeddedness. To imagine science as detached from values is to ignore the historical record of how power and ideology have influenced research agendas, from colonial anthropology to corporate-funded pharmacology. In the twenty-first century, as humanity stands at the threshold of genetic redesign and machine consciousness, the integration of ethical reasoning into scientific practice is no longer optional but essential. The true measure of scientific progress will thus depend not merely on discovery, but on discernment — on our collective ability to wield knowledge without surrendering wisdom.
Q3493.According to the passage, why is the traditional notion of scientific neutrality considered "untenable"?
- AScience has lost its empirical foundation.
- BModern research is influenced by social and political forces.
- CScientists no longer rely on observation.
- DTechnology has replaced the need for experimentation.
Show answer
Concept: Neutrality is rejected because science now shapes society directly.
- The passage says data, algorithms and biotechnology directly shape social realities, and scientists act as agents of change.
- So research is tied to social and political forces – it cannot be neutral.
Trick: Options (A), (C), (D) make claims the passage never makes – eliminate.
Answer: (B) Modern research is influenced by social and political forces.
अवधारणा: विज्ञान अब समाज को सीधे प्रभावित करता है, इसलिए तटस्थ नहीं।
- गद्यांश: डेटा, एल्गोरिद्म, जैव-प्रौद्योगिकी सीधे सामाजिक वास्तविकता गढ़ते हैं; वैज्ञानिक परिवर्तन के सक्रिय कारक हैं।
- अतः शोध सामाजिक-राजनीतिक शक्तियों से जुड़ा है।
ट्रिक: (A), (C), (D) की बातें गद्यांश में नहीं – हटा दें।
उत्तर: (B) Modern research is influenced by social and political forces.
Directions (Qs. 93-97): Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.
Science, as both a method and an institution, occupies a paradoxical position within modern society. It promises objectivity, progress, and mastery over nature, yet it simultaneously engenders profound ethical dilemmas. The relentless pursuit of innovation often outpaces moral reflection, leaving humanity to confront consequences it is ill-prepared to manage. From genetic modification to artificial intelligence, scientific advancement expands the boundaries of what can be done, while offering little guidance on what should be done. This widening gap between capability and conscience underscores the need for an ethical framework that evolves in tandem with discovery. Historically, science has been regarded as a neutral enterprise — its value determined by human application. However, this notion of neutrality is increasingly untenable in a world where data, algorithms, and biotechnologies directly shape social realities. The scientist no longer functions solely as an observer but as an active agent of transformation, capable of altering both the environment and the human condition itself. Consequently, the question of responsibility becomes inseparable from the act of inquiry. Ethics, then, cannot remain external to science; it must be integrated within its very methodology. The development of nuclear weapons, surveillance technologies, and environmental exploitation has demonstrated that knowledge divorced from moral accountability leads to existential peril. In this sense, ethical deliberation is not an impediment to progress but its precondition. The challenge lies in reconciling the empirical rigor of science with the normative demands of ethics — an endeavor that requires humility, dialogue, and an awareness of science’s sociopolitical embeddedness. To imagine science as detached from values is to ignore the historical record of how power and ideology have influenced research agendas, from colonial anthropology to corporate-funded pharmacology. In the twenty-first century, as humanity stands at the threshold of genetic redesign and machine consciousness, the integration of ethical reasoning into scientific practice is no longer optional but essential. The true measure of scientific progress will thus depend not merely on discovery, but on discernment — on our collective ability to wield knowledge without surrendering wisdom.
Q3494.What does the author imply about the relationship between ethics and progress?
- AEthics restricts technological innovation.
- BEthical reflection is essential for genuine progress.
- CScientific progress occurs independently of ethics.
- DEthical principles are obsolete in modern science.
Show answer
Concept: The author wants ethics built into science, not kept outside.
- Ethics 'must be integrated within its very methodology'.
- Ethical thinking is shown as a condition for real progress, not a barrier.
Trick: The author's whole argument pushes for ethics – options calling ethics a hindrance or obsolete contradict it.
Answer: (B) Ethical reflection is essential for genuine progress.
अवधारणा: लेखक चाहता है कि नैतिकता विज्ञान के भीतर हो।
- नैतिकता को विज्ञान की कार्यप्रणाली में शामिल करना ज़रूरी बताया।
- नैतिक चिंतन वास्तविक प्रगति की शर्त है, बाधा नहीं।
ट्रिक: पूरा तर्क नैतिकता के पक्ष में है – उसे बाधा/अप्रासंगिक कहने वाले विकल्प गलत।
उत्तर: (B) Ethical reflection is essential for genuine progress.
Directions (Qs. 93-97): Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.
Science, as both a method and an institution, occupies a paradoxical position within modern society. It promises objectivity, progress, and mastery over nature, yet it simultaneously engenders profound ethical dilemmas. The relentless pursuit of innovation often outpaces moral reflection, leaving humanity to confront consequences it is ill-prepared to manage. From genetic modification to artificial intelligence, scientific advancement expands the boundaries of what can be done, while offering little guidance on what should be done. This widening gap between capability and conscience underscores the need for an ethical framework that evolves in tandem with discovery. Historically, science has been regarded as a neutral enterprise — its value determined by human application. However, this notion of neutrality is increasingly untenable in a world where data, algorithms, and biotechnologies directly shape social realities. The scientist no longer functions solely as an observer but as an active agent of transformation, capable of altering both the environment and the human condition itself. Consequently, the question of responsibility becomes inseparable from the act of inquiry. Ethics, then, cannot remain external to science; it must be integrated within its very methodology. The development of nuclear weapons, surveillance technologies, and environmental exploitation has demonstrated that knowledge divorced from moral accountability leads to existential peril. In this sense, ethical deliberation is not an impediment to progress but its precondition. The challenge lies in reconciling the empirical rigor of science with the normative demands of ethics — an endeavor that requires humility, dialogue, and an awareness of science’s sociopolitical embeddedness. To imagine science as detached from values is to ignore the historical record of how power and ideology have influenced research agendas, from colonial anthropology to corporate-funded pharmacology. In the twenty-first century, as humanity stands at the threshold of genetic redesign and machine consciousness, the integration of ethical reasoning into scientific practice is no longer optional but essential. The true measure of scientific progress will thus depend not merely on discovery, but on discernment — on our collective ability to wield knowledge without surrendering wisdom.
Q3495.Which of the following best captures the meaning of "capability and conscience" in the passage?
- ATechnical ability versus moral responsibility.
- BKnowledge versus ignorance.
- CAmbition versus fear.
- DDiscovery versus application.
Show answer
Concept: The phrase sums up 'what can be done' vs 'what should be done'.
- Capability = technical ability (what science can do).
- Conscience = moral responsibility (what one should do).
- So: technical ability versus moral responsibility.
Yaad rakhein: Conscience = inner sense of right and wrong.
Answer: (A) Technical ability versus moral responsibility.
अवधारणा: यह वाक्यांश 'क्या किया जा सकता है' बनाम 'क्या करना चाहिए' दर्शाता है।
- Capability = तकनीकी क्षमता।
- Conscience = नैतिक ज़िम्मेदारी।
- अतः तकनीकी क्षमता बनाम नैतिक उत्तरदायित्व।
याद रखें: Conscience = सही-गलत का आंतरिक बोध, अंतरात्मा।
उत्तर: (A) Technical ability versus moral responsibility.
Directions (Qs. 93-97): Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.
Science, as both a method and an institution, occupies a paradoxical position within modern society. It promises objectivity, progress, and mastery over nature, yet it simultaneously engenders profound ethical dilemmas. The relentless pursuit of innovation often outpaces moral reflection, leaving humanity to confront consequences it is ill-prepared to manage. From genetic modification to artificial intelligence, scientific advancement expands the boundaries of what can be done, while offering little guidance on what should be done. This widening gap between capability and conscience underscores the need for an ethical framework that evolves in tandem with discovery. Historically, science has been regarded as a neutral enterprise — its value determined by human application. However, this notion of neutrality is increasingly untenable in a world where data, algorithms, and biotechnologies directly shape social realities. The scientist no longer functions solely as an observer but as an active agent of transformation, capable of altering both the environment and the human condition itself. Consequently, the question of responsibility becomes inseparable from the act of inquiry. Ethics, then, cannot remain external to science; it must be integrated within its very methodology. The development of nuclear weapons, surveillance technologies, and environmental exploitation has demonstrated that knowledge divorced from moral accountability leads to existential peril. In this sense, ethical deliberation is not an impediment to progress but its precondition. The challenge lies in reconciling the empirical rigor of science with the normative demands of ethics — an endeavor that requires humility, dialogue, and an awareness of science’s sociopolitical embeddedness. To imagine science as detached from values is to ignore the historical record of how power and ideology have influenced research agendas, from colonial anthropology to corporate-funded pharmacology. In the twenty-first century, as humanity stands at the threshold of genetic redesign and machine consciousness, the integration of ethical reasoning into scientific practice is no longer optional but essential. The true measure of scientific progress will thus depend not merely on discovery, but on discernment — on our collective ability to wield knowledge without surrendering wisdom.
Q3496.The author's tone toward science can best be described as:
- ACondemnatory and pessimistic.
- BAnalytical and cautionary.
- CDetached and indifferent.
- DRomantic and idealistic.
Show answer
Concept: Tone = the author's attitude shown through word choice.
- He reasons carefully about science's benefits and risks → analytical.
- He warns about ignoring ethics → cautionary.
- He neither condemns science nor praises it blindly.
Trick: Balanced, argued passages with warnings → 'analytical/cautionary' is the safe pick.
Answer: (B) Analytical and cautionary.
अवधारणा: लहजा = शब्दों से झलकता लेखक का दृष्टिकोण।
- विज्ञान के लाभ-जोखिम पर तर्कपूर्ण विचार → analytical।
- नैतिकता की उपेक्षा पर चेतावनी → cautionary।
- न विज्ञान की निंदा, न अंधी प्रशंसा।
ट्रिक: संतुलित तर्क + चेतावनी वाला गद्यांश → 'analytical and cautionary'।
उत्तर: (B) Analytical and cautionary.
Directions (Qs. 93-97): Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.
Science, as both a method and an institution, occupies a paradoxical position within modern society. It promises objectivity, progress, and mastery over nature, yet it simultaneously engenders profound ethical dilemmas. The relentless pursuit of innovation often outpaces moral reflection, leaving humanity to confront consequences it is ill-prepared to manage. From genetic modification to artificial intelligence, scientific advancement expands the boundaries of what can be done, while offering little guidance on what should be done. This widening gap between capability and conscience underscores the need for an ethical framework that evolves in tandem with discovery. Historically, science has been regarded as a neutral enterprise — its value determined by human application. However, this notion of neutrality is increasingly untenable in a world where data, algorithms, and biotechnologies directly shape social realities. The scientist no longer functions solely as an observer but as an active agent of transformation, capable of altering both the environment and the human condition itself. Consequently, the question of responsibility becomes inseparable from the act of inquiry. Ethics, then, cannot remain external to science; it must be integrated within its very methodology. The development of nuclear weapons, surveillance technologies, and environmental exploitation has demonstrated that knowledge divorced from moral accountability leads to existential peril. In this sense, ethical deliberation is not an impediment to progress but its precondition. The challenge lies in reconciling the empirical rigor of science with the normative demands of ethics — an endeavor that requires humility, dialogue, and an awareness of science’s sociopolitical embeddedness. To imagine science as detached from values is to ignore the historical record of how power and ideology have influenced research agendas, from colonial anthropology to corporate-funded pharmacology. In the twenty-first century, as humanity stands at the threshold of genetic redesign and machine consciousness, the integration of ethical reasoning into scientific practice is no longer optional but essential. The true measure of scientific progress will thus depend not merely on discovery, but on discernment — on our collective ability to wield knowledge without surrendering wisdom.
Q3497.The closest meaning of the word "discernment" as used in the passage is:
- AConfusion
- BJudgment
- CRepetition
- DAchievement
Show answer
Concept: Discernment = the ability to judge well.
- The passage contrasts mere discovery with discernment – wise judgement about using discoveries.
- Confusion is the opposite; repetition and achievement don't fit.
Yaad rakhein: Discerning (adj.) = showing good judgement.
Answer: (B) Judgment
अवधारणा: Discernment = अच्छा निर्णय करने की क्षमता, विवेक।
- गद्यांश में केवल खोज के मुकाबले विवेकपूर्ण निर्णय पर ज़ोर है।
- Confusion उल्टा अर्थ; repetition, achievement मेल नहीं खाते।
याद रखें: Discerning (विशेषण) = विवेकशील।
उत्तर: (B) Judgment
Q3498.Select the correct indirect/direct form of the given sentence.
The doctor advised that excessive screen time could harm one's eyesight over time.
- AThe doctor said, "Excessive screen time can harm your eyesight over time."
- BThe doctor said, "Excessive screen time could harm your eyesight over time."
- CThe doctor said, "Excessive screen time harms one's eyesight over time."
- DThe doctor said, "Excessive screen time will harm your eyesight over time."
Show answer
Concept: Reverse the backshift when converting reported speech to direct.
- 'could' in reported speech → 'can' in direct speech.
- 'one's' (general) → 'your' when the doctor speaks directly.
- Only option (A) has both 'can' and 'your'; (B) keeps 'could', (C) drops the modal, (D) uses 'will'.
Trick: Backshift pairs: can → could, will → would, may → might.
Answer: (A) The doctor said, "Excessive screen time can harm your eyesight over time."
अवधारणा: अप्रत्यक्ष से प्रत्यक्ष बनाते समय काल-परिवर्तन उलटें।
- 'could' → 'can'।
- 'one's' → 'your' (डॉक्टर सीधे बोल रहे हैं)।
- केवल विकल्प (A) में 'can' और 'your' दोनों हैं; (B) में 'could', (D) में 'will'।
ट्रिक: जोड़े: can → could, will → would, may → might।
उत्तर: (A) The doctor said, "Excessive screen time can harm your eyesight over time."
Q3499.Select the correct indirect/direct form of the given sentence.
She said, "I am learning French."
- AShe said that she was learning French.
- BShe said that she is learning French.
- CShe said that she has been learning French.
- DShe said that she will learn French.
Show answer
Concept: Past reporting verb → present continuous changes to past continuous.
- 'said' is past → 'am learning' becomes 'was learning'.
- 'I' → 'she'; add 'that'.
- She said that she was learning French.
Trick: is/am/are + ing → was/were + ing.
Answer: (A) She said that she was learning French.
अवधारणा: रिपोर्टिंग क्रिया भूतकाल में हो तो present continuous → past continuous।
- 'am learning' → 'was learning'।
- 'I' → 'she', 'that' जोड़ें।
- She said that she was learning French.
ट्रिक: is/am/are + ing → was/were + ing।
उत्तर: (A) She said that she was learning French.
Q3500.Sentences of a paragraph are given below in jumbled order. Arrange the sentences in the correct order to form a meaningful and coherent paragraph.
1. For centuries, cartographers placed themselves at the center of the world map, revealing more about human ego than geographic accuracy.
2. The projection of power through maps demonstrates how knowledge can serve as an instrument of domination.
3. Colonial empires redrew boundaries to reflect their influence, shaping political realities that persist even today.
4. Thus, the act of mapping has always been less about location and more about perception.
- A1, 3, 2, 4
- B1, 2, 3, 4
- C4, 1, 3, 2
- D2, 1, 3, 4
Show answer
Concept: Find the opener, link examples to the general point, and end with the conclusion.
- 1 opens: map-makers putting themselves at the centre.
- 3 gives the colonial example of redrawing boundaries; 2 generalises it as knowledge used for domination.
- 4 starts with 'Thus' → conclusion. Order: 1, 3, 2, 4.
Trick: A sentence beginning with 'Thus/Hence' is almost always the last one.
Answer: (A) 1, 3, 2, 4
अवधारणा: आरंभ, उदाहरण, सामान्य बात और निष्कर्ष क्रम में लगाएँ।
- 1 से शुरुआत: मानचित्रकार स्वयं को केंद्र में रखते थे।
- 3 में औपनिवेशिक उदाहरण; 2 उसे सामान्य रूप देता है (ज्ञान = प्रभुत्व का साधन)।
- 4 'Thus' से शुरू → निष्कर्ष। क्रम: 1, 3, 2, 4।
ट्रिक: 'Thus/Hence' से शुरू होने वाला वाक्य प्रायः अंतिम होता है।
उत्तर: (A) 1, 3, 2, 4