Q3701.Identify the part of the sentence that contains a grammatical error.
A. It is essential that she
B. prepares for the upcoming interview
C. and that she makes
D. a prompt, professional, and polite entrance at the venue.
- AIt is essential that she
- Bprepares for the upcoming interview
- Cand that she makes
- Da prompt, professional, and polite entrance at the venue.
Show answer
Concept: After 'It is essential/necessary/vital that…', the verb stays in its base form for every subject.
- Subject 'she' tempts us to write 'prepares', but this pattern ignores the usual -s.
- Correct part B: prepare for the upcoming interview.
- Part C 'that she makes' should likewise be 'make'; the error marked in the key is part B.
Trick: See 'essential / important / imperative / suggest / insist + that' → write V1 with no -s, no 'should' needed.
Answer: (B) prepares for the upcoming interview
अवधारणा: 'It is essential that…' जैसे वाक्यों में that के बाद क्रिया हमेशा base form (V1) में आती है, subject चाहे कोई भी हो।
हल:
- 'she' देखकर 'prepares' लिखना स्वाभाविक लगता है, पर इस structure में -s नहीं लगता।
- सही भाग B: prepare for the upcoming interview।
- भाग C में भी 'make' होना चाहिए; key के अनुसार त्रुटि भाग B में है।
ट्रिक: essential / important / suggest / insist + that → बिना -s वाली V1 क्रिया।
उत्तर: (B) prepares for the upcoming interview
Q3702.Identify the part of the sentence that contains a grammatical error.
A. The tall player
B. proves to be
C. a good shooter
D. and more stronger than the rest.
- AThe tall player
- Bproves to be
- Ca good shooter
- Dand more stronger than the rest
Show answer
Concept: Never use 'more' together with an -er comparative.
- 'Strong' is a one-syllable adjective → comparative is 'stronger'.
- 'More stronger' marks the comparison twice, which is wrong.
- Correct part D: and stronger than the rest.
Trick: Short adjectives: -er; long adjectives: more ___. Pick one, never both (more better, more taller = wrong).
Answer: (D) and more stronger than the rest
अवधारणा: -er वाली comparative degree के साथ 'more' नहीं लगाया जाता।
हल:
- 'Strong' एक syllable का adjective है → comparative 'stronger'।
- 'more stronger' में तुलना दो बार हो रही है, जो गलत है।
- सही भाग D: and stronger than the rest।
ट्रिक: छोटे adjective में -er, बड़े में more; दोनों साथ कभी नहीं (more better ✗)।
उत्तर: (D) and more stronger than the rest
Q3703.Fill in the blank with the most appropriate preposition:
He fought the changes and trends, holding his ground firm.
- Aagainst
- Bacross
- Cthrough
- Ddespite
Show answer
Concept: To oppose or resist something, English uses 'fight against'.
- 'Holding his ground firm' shows resistance → opposition is needed.
- He fought against the changes and trends.
- 'Despite' already means 'in spite of' and cannot follow 'fought'; 'across/through' show movement.
Trick: Opposition words — fight, struggle, protest, campaign, rebel — all pair with 'against'.
Answer: (A) against
अवधारणा: किसी चीज़ का विरोध करने के लिए 'fight against' प्रयोग होता है।
हल:
- 'holding his ground firm' = डटे रहना, यानी विरोध का भाव।
- He fought against the changes and trends.
- 'despite' का अर्थ 'के बावजूद' है, 'across/through' गति बताते हैं — यहाँ फिट नहीं।
ट्रिक: fight, struggle, protest, rebel — विरोध वाले शब्दों के साथ 'against'।
उत्तर: (A) against
Q3704.Fill in the blank with the most appropriate phrasal verb:
The locals refused to the loud noise they had endured for years.
- Aput down to
- Bput across
- Cput up with
- Dput aside
Show answer
Concept: 'Put up with' = tolerate something unpleasant.
- The noise was 'endured for years' → idea of tolerating.
- They refused to put up with it any longer.
- Put down to = blame on; put across = explain clearly; put aside = save/ignore.
Trick: Replace the blank with 'tolerate' — only 'put up with' gives the same meaning.
Answer: (C) put up with
अवधारणा: 'Put up with' का अर्थ है — किसी अप्रिय चीज़ को सहन करना (tolerate)।
हल:
- शोर को 'सालों से सहा' गया था → सहन करने का भाव।
- लोगों ने अब और put up with करने से मना कर दिया।
- put down to = दोष देना; put across = समझाना; put aside = अलग रखना/बचाना।
ट्रिक: खाली जगह में 'tolerate' रखकर देखें — अर्थ केवल 'put up with' से मेल खाता है।
उत्तर: (C) put up with
Q3705.Choose the correctly spelt word:
- AAcommplice
- BAccomplise
- CAcoomplice
- DAccomplice
Show answer
Concept: Accomplice = a partner in a crime.
- Break it: ac + com + plice.
- Double 'c' at the start, single 'm', ending '-ice'.
- Only option D follows all three.
Trick: Think 'ACCOunt + COMPLICated' — double c first, then 'complic-'.
Answer: (D) Accomplice
अवधारणा: Accomplice का अर्थ — अपराध में साथी (सहअपराधी)।
हल:
- शब्द तोड़ें: ac + com + plice।
- शुरू में दो 'c', 'm' एक बार, अंत '-ice' से।
- तीनों बातें केवल विकल्प D में हैं।
ट्रिक: 'ac' + 'complice' जोड़ें → Accomplice; 'mm' या '-ise' वाले विकल्प तुरंत हटाएँ।
उत्तर: (D) Accomplice
Q3706.Which of the following sentences uses the word "fine" with the same meaning as in the following sentence?
"The heavy fine was paid in court"
- AIt was a fine day for a walk.
- BThe driver's fine cost him his wage.
- CThe sand was extremely fine to the touch.
- DShe felt fine after taking the medicine.
Show answer
Concept: Same spelling, different meanings: decide the sense from context.
- Given sentence: a fine 'paid in court' = money penalty (noun).
- B: the driver's fine cost him his wage → penalty again.
- A = pleasant (day), C = very small grains, D = healthy.
Trick: Ask 'can I put penalty in its place?' Only B passes.
Answer: (B) The driver's fine cost him his wage.
अवधारणा: एक ही शब्द के अलग अर्थ होते हैं; context से अर्थ तय करें।
हल:
- दिए वाक्य में 'fine' = अदालत में भरा गया जुर्माना (noun)।
- B में भी driver का fine = जुर्माना।
- A = सुहावना दिन, C = बारीक रेत, D = स्वस्थ महसूस करना।
ट्रिक: 'fine' की जगह 'penalty' रखकर देखें — केवल B में अर्थ बना रहता है।
उत्तर: (B) The driver's fine cost him his wage.
Q3707.Choose the correctly spelt word:
- APerspicuous
- BPrespicuous
- CPerspisuous
- DPerspicuuos
Show answer
Concept: Perspicuous = clearly expressed, easy to understand.
- Starts with 'per' (as in perspective), not 'pre'.
- Middle '-spic-' uses c; ending '-uous'.
- So the word is Per-spic-u-ous.
Trick: Link it to 'perspective' — same 'persp-' opening; reject 'Pre-' at once.
Answer: (A) Perspicuous
अवधारणा: Perspicuous का अर्थ — स्पष्ट रूप से व्यक्त, आसानी से समझ में आने वाला।
हल:
- शुरुआत 'per' से (perspective जैसे), 'pre' नहीं।
- बीच में '-spic-' (c के साथ), अंत '-uous'।
- सही रूप: Per-spic-u-ous।
ट्रिक: 'perspective' याद रखें — वही 'persp-' शुरुआत; 'Pre-' वाला विकल्प हटाएँ।
उत्तर: (A) Perspicuous
Directions (Qs. 8-12): Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.
One of the most significant moral quandaries of the modern era is the
advancement of genetic engineering, specifically the use of CRISPR technology for germline editing in humans. The potential for eradicating hereditary diseases is pitted against deep-seated ethical fears regarding the creation of "designer babies." Proponents argue that gene editing could eliminate suffering caused by conditions like cystic fibrosis or Huntington's disease, effectively removing genetic defects before birth. They suggest it offers a future where preventative medicine reaches the DNA level, ensuring healthier generations and reducing the burden on healthcare systems.
The ethical repercussions are serious, nonetheless. The most compelling argument is the shift from therapy to enhancement, creating a permanent societal divide. Critics fear a future where genetic modifications are purchased by the wealthy, leading to a "genobility" with superior physical and cognitive traits. This raises critical questions of consent: since future generations cannot consent to these edits, do we have the right to permanently alter the human genome? The phenomenon known as "off-target effects," where editing one gene inadvertently damages another, also adds to the difficulty in assessing safety. This built-in uncertainty of long-term biological consequences tests the very foundations of bioethics. Essentially, the debate about germline editing forces us to confront not only the technology but also human ambition, equity, and the ethical limits we are prepared to place on our own evolution.
Q3708.Which of the following is the most compelling ethical argument against germline editing mentioned in the passage ?
- AThe potential for increased healthcare costs
- BThe speed at which genetic changes occur
- CThe shift from medical therapy to genetic enhancement
- DThe lack of technological precision
Show answer
Concept: Look for the line the passage itself labels 'most compelling'.
- Paragraph 2 names the strongest argument: moving from therapy (curing) to enhancement (improving healthy people).
- This could split society permanently — option C.
- Off-target effects are a safety issue; costs and speed are not raised.
Trick: When a question repeats a superlative from the passage ('most compelling'), the answer sits in that very sentence.
Answer: (C) The shift from medical therapy to genetic enhancement
अवधारणा: passage में जिस बात को 'most compelling' कहा गया है, वही उत्तर है।
हल:
- दूसरे paragraph में: therapy (इलाज) से enhancement (स्वस्थ व्यक्ति को 'बेहतर' बनाना) की ओर बदलाव।
- इससे समाज में स्थायी बँटवारा हो सकता है — विकल्प C।
- off-target effects सुरक्षा का मुद्दा है; लागत या गति की बात नहीं है।
ट्रिक: प्रश्न में passage वाला superlative शब्द दिखे तो उसी वाक्य में उत्तर खोजें।
उत्तर: (C) The shift from medical therapy to genetic enhancement
Directions (Qs. 8-12): Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.
One of the most significant moral quandaries of the modern era is the
advancement of genetic engineering, specifically the use of CRISPR technology for germline editing in humans. The potential for eradicating hereditary diseases is pitted against deep-seated ethical fears regarding the creation of "designer babies." Proponents argue that gene editing could eliminate suffering caused by conditions like cystic fibrosis or Huntington's disease, effectively removing genetic defects before birth. They suggest it offers a future where preventative medicine reaches the DNA level, ensuring healthier generations and reducing the burden on healthcare systems.
The ethical repercussions are serious, nonetheless. The most compelling argument is the shift from therapy to enhancement, creating a permanent societal divide. Critics fear a future where genetic modifications are purchased by the wealthy, leading to a "genobility" with superior physical and cognitive traits. This raises critical questions of consent: since future generations cannot consent to these edits, do we have the right to permanently alter the human genome? The phenomenon known as "off-target effects," where editing one gene inadvertently damages another, also adds to the difficulty in assessing safety. This built-in uncertainty of long-term biological consequences tests the very foundations of bioethics. Essentially, the debate about germline editing forces us to confront not only the technology but also human ambition, equity, and the ethical limits we are prepared to place on our own evolution.
Q3709.According to the passage, what is the primary concern regarding the rights of future generations?
- AThey will not have access to healthcare
- BThey cannot provide consent for permanent genetic alterations
- CThey will be immune to all diseases
- DThey will be forced to use CRISPR technology
Show answer
Concept: Locate where 'future generations' appear in the passage.
- The passage asks whether we may permanently alter the genome when unborn people cannot agree to it.
- So the worry is lack of consent — option B.
- Healthcare access, total immunity or forced CRISPR use are never mentioned.
Trick: Key word match: 'rights' ↔ 'consent'. Pick the option that carries the passage's own key word.
Answer: (B) They cannot provide consent for permanent genetic alterations
अवधारणा: passage में 'future generations' वाला वाक्य खोजें।
हल:
- लेख पूछता है — जो पीढ़ियाँ अभी जन्मी नहीं, वे सहमति नहीं दे सकतीं; तो क्या genome स्थायी रूप से बदलना उचित है?
- अतः चिंता 'consent' (सहमति) की है — विकल्प B।
- स्वास्थ्य सुविधा, हर रोग से immunity या जबरन CRISPR — इनका ज़िक्र नहीं।
ट्रिक: 'rights' वाले प्रश्न में passage का key word 'consent' जिस विकल्प में है, वही चुनें।
उत्तर: (B) They cannot provide consent for permanent genetic alterations
Directions (Qs. 8-12): Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.
One of the most significant moral quandaries of the modern era is the
advancement of genetic engineering, specifically the use of CRISPR technology for germline editing in humans. The potential for eradicating hereditary diseases is pitted against deep-seated ethical fears regarding the creation of "designer babies." Proponents argue that gene editing could eliminate suffering caused by conditions like cystic fibrosis or Huntington's disease, effectively removing genetic defects before birth. They suggest it offers a future where preventative medicine reaches the DNA level, ensuring healthier generations and reducing the burden on healthcare systems.
The ethical repercussions are serious, nonetheless. The most compelling argument is the shift from therapy to enhancement, creating a permanent societal divide. Critics fear a future where genetic modifications are purchased by the wealthy, leading to a "genobility" with superior physical and cognitive traits. This raises critical questions of consent: since future generations cannot consent to these edits, do we have the right to permanently alter the human genome? The phenomenon known as "off-target effects," where editing one gene inadvertently damages another, also adds to the difficulty in assessing safety. This built-in uncertainty of long-term biological consequences tests the very foundations of bioethics. Essentially, the debate about germline editing forces us to confront not only the technology but also human ambition, equity, and the ethical limits we are prepared to place on our own evolution.
Q3710.In the passage, the term "genobility" refers to:
- AA genetic defect caused by CRISPR
- BA social class defined by superior genetic traits
- CThe ability to edit genes quickly
- DThe scientists who perform gene editing
Show answer
Concept: A coined word is decoded from its parts and its sentence.
- Gene + nobility → a 'genetic aristocracy'.
- The passage links it to the wealthy buying superior physical and mental traits.
- So it means a social class marked by better genes — option B.
Trick: Split a new word into known words: 'nobility' = upper class, so think 'class', not 'defect' or 'scientists'.
Answer: (B) A social class defined by superior genetic traits
अवधारणा: नया गढ़ा गया शब्द उसके हिस्सों और वाक्य से समझें।
हल:
- Gene + nobility (कुलीन वर्ग) = 'आनुवंशिक कुलीन वर्ग'।
- passage में अमीरों द्वारा बेहतर शारीरिक-मानसिक गुण खरीदने से इसे जोड़ा गया है।
- अर्थ: बेहतर genes वाला सामाजिक वर्ग — विकल्प B।
ट्रिक: शब्द तोड़ें: 'nobility' = उच्च वर्ग; इसलिए उत्तर में 'class' वाला विकल्प।
उत्तर: (B) A social class defined by superior genetic traits
Directions (Qs. 8-12): Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.
One of the most significant moral quandaries of the modern era is the
advancement of genetic engineering, specifically the use of CRISPR technology for germline editing in humans. The potential for eradicating hereditary diseases is pitted against deep-seated ethical fears regarding the creation of "designer babies." Proponents argue that gene editing could eliminate suffering caused by conditions like cystic fibrosis or Huntington's disease, effectively removing genetic defects before birth. They suggest it offers a future where preventative medicine reaches the DNA level, ensuring healthier generations and reducing the burden on healthcare systems.
The ethical repercussions are serious, nonetheless. The most compelling argument is the shift from therapy to enhancement, creating a permanent societal divide. Critics fear a future where genetic modifications are purchased by the wealthy, leading to a "genobility" with superior physical and cognitive traits. This raises critical questions of consent: since future generations cannot consent to these edits, do we have the right to permanently alter the human genome? The phenomenon known as "off-target effects," where editing one gene inadvertently damages another, also adds to the difficulty in assessing safety. This built-in uncertainty of long-term biological consequences tests the very foundations of bioethics. Essentially, the debate about germline editing forces us to confront not only the technology but also human ambition, equity, and the ethical limits we are prepared to place on our own evolution.
Q3711.What is the primary safety concern raised by the "off-target effects" of gene editing?
- AIt makes the process too expensive
- BIt slows down the editing process
- CIt involves inadvertent damage to other genes
- DIt prevents the elimination of hereditary diseases
Show answer
Concept: Definitions given inside the passage answer 'what is meant' questions.
- The passage explains off-target effects: editing one gene accidentally harms another.
- That unintended damage is the safety worry — option C.
- Nothing is said here about cost, speed, or stopping cures.
Trick: The word 'inadvertently' in the passage = 'inadvertent' in option C — a direct echo.
Answer: (C) It involves inadvertent damage to other genes
अवधारणा: passage के अंदर दी गई परिभाषा से ही उत्तर मिलता है।
हल:
- off-target effects = एक gene बदलते समय गलती से दूसरा gene खराब हो जाना।
- यही अनचाहा नुकसान सुरक्षा की चिंता है — विकल्प C।
- लागत, गति या रोग खत्म न होने की बात यहाँ नहीं है।
ट्रिक: passage का 'inadvertently' और विकल्प C का 'inadvertent' — सीधा मेल।
उत्तर: (C) It involves inadvertent damage to other genes
Directions (Qs. 8-12): Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.
One of the most significant moral quandaries of the modern era is the
advancement of genetic engineering, specifically the use of CRISPR technology for germline editing in humans. The potential for eradicating hereditary diseases is pitted against deep-seated ethical fears regarding the creation of "designer babies." Proponents argue that gene editing could eliminate suffering caused by conditions like cystic fibrosis or Huntington's disease, effectively removing genetic defects before birth. They suggest it offers a future where preventative medicine reaches the DNA level, ensuring healthier generations and reducing the burden on healthcare systems.
The ethical repercussions are serious, nonetheless. The most compelling argument is the shift from therapy to enhancement, creating a permanent societal divide. Critics fear a future where genetic modifications are purchased by the wealthy, leading to a "genobility" with superior physical and cognitive traits. This raises critical questions of consent: since future generations cannot consent to these edits, do we have the right to permanently alter the human genome? The phenomenon known as "off-target effects," where editing one gene inadvertently damages another, also adds to the difficulty in assessing safety. This built-in uncertainty of long-term biological consequences tests the very foundations of bioethics. Essentially, the debate about germline editing forces us to confront not only the technology but also human ambition, equity, and the ethical limits we are prepared to place on our own evolution.
Q3712.Which argument in favor of germline editing is most strongly supported by proponents?
- AIt allows for the creation of designer babies
- BIt reduces the need for all doctors
- CIt eliminates suffering caused by hereditary diseases
- DIt guarantees superior cognitive abilities for all
Show answer
Concept: Separate what supporters say (para 1) from what critics fear (para 2).
- Proponents: gene editing can end suffering from diseases like cystic fibrosis and Huntington's.
- That is option C.
- Designer babies and superior cognition are critics' fears; 'no need for doctors' is never claimed.
Trick: Options with extreme words — 'all doctors', 'for all', 'guarantees' — are usually wrong in RC.
Answer: (C) It eliminates suffering caused by hereditary diseases
अवधारणा: समर्थकों की बात (para 1) और आलोचकों के डर (para 2) को अलग रखें।
हल:
- समर्थक कहते हैं: cystic fibrosis, Huntington's जैसे वंशानुगत रोगों की पीड़ा खत्म हो सकती है।
- यही विकल्प C है।
- designer babies और बेहतर बुद्धि आलोचकों का डर है; डॉक्टरों की ज़रूरत खत्म होना कहीं नहीं कहा गया।
ट्रिक: RC में 'all', 'guarantees' जैसे अति वाले शब्दों वाले विकल्प प्रायः गलत होते हैं।
उत्तर: (C) It eliminates suffering caused by hereditary diseases
Q3713.Choose the correct meaning of the idiom: Foul play
- AA bad smelling theatre or playground
- BUnfair and dishonest behaviour
- CUnpleasant weather for playing
- DA drama which is badly produced
Show answer
Concept: Idioms carry a figurative, not literal, meaning.
- 'Foul play' = unfair, dishonest or criminal conduct.
- Common use: police suspect foul play in a mysterious death.
- Options A, C, D read 'foul' and 'play' literally.
Trick: In sports, a 'foul' is breaking the rules — foul play = playing (acting) against the rules.
Answer: (B) Unfair and dishonest behaviour
अवधारणा: मुहावरे का अर्थ शाब्दिक नहीं, लाक्षणिक होता है।
हल:
- 'Foul play' = बेईमानी, धोखा या आपराधिक हरकत।
- जैसे: रहस्यमय मौत में पुलिस को foul play का शक है।
- A, C, D शब्दों का शाब्दिक अर्थ ले रहे हैं।
ट्रिक: खेल में 'foul' = नियम तोड़ना; foul play = नियम के विरुद्ध आचरण।
उत्तर: (B) Unfair and dishonest behaviour
Q3714.Choose the correct meaning of the idiom: Grasp at straws
- ATo collect dry grass
- BTo hold something firmly
- CTo try any possible means in a desperate situation
- DTo waste time on useless work
Show answer
Concept: 'Grasp/clutch at straws' = try anything, however unlikely, out of desperation.
- Image: a drowning person grabbing even a straw to stay afloat.
- Example: With no evidence left, the defence was grasping at straws.
- A and B are literal; D (wasting time) changes the sense.
Trick: Hindi parallel: 'डूबते को तिनके का सहारा' — same picture, same meaning.
Answer: (C) To try any possible means in a desperate situation
अवधारणा: 'Grasp at straws' = हताशा में कोई भी, कमज़ोर-सा उपाय आज़माना।
हल:
- चित्र: डूबता आदमी तिनका भी पकड़ लेता है।
- उदाहरण: सबूत न होने पर वकील grasping at straws कर रहा था।
- A, B शाब्दिक हैं; D (समय बर्बाद करना) अलग अर्थ है।
ट्रिक: हिंदी मुहावरा 'डूबते को तिनके का सहारा' — बिल्कुल वही भाव।
उत्तर: (C) To try any possible means in a desperate situation
Q3715.Select the most appropriate antonym of the word: Transient
- ATemporary
- BFleeting
- CPermanent
- DBrief
Show answer
Concept: Transient = short-lived, passing quickly.
- Opposite idea: lasting for ever.
- Permanent fits.
- Temporary, fleeting, brief are synonyms, not antonyms.
Trick: Three options mean the same thing → the odd one out is the antonym.
Answer: (C) Permanent
अवधारणा: Transient = क्षणिक, थोड़े समय का।
हल:
- विपरीत अर्थ: हमेशा रहने वाला।
- Permanent (स्थायी) सही है।
- Temporary, fleeting, brief — ये सब समानार्थी हैं।
ट्रिक: तीन विकल्प एक जैसे अर्थ वाले हों तो अलग वाला ही antonym होता है।
उत्तर: (C) Permanent
Q3716.Choose the correct one-word substitute for:
A post-mortem examination to discover the cause of death or the extent of disease.
- ABiopsy
- BForensic
- CAutopsy
- DCrematorium
Show answer
Concept: Autopsy = examination of a dead body to find cause of death.
- Post-mortem examination → Autopsy.
- Biopsy = tissue test from a living body.
- Forensic = related to crime science; crematorium = place for burning the dead.
Trick: auto (self) + opsy (seeing) = autopsy; bio (life) + opsy = biopsy on the living.
Answer: (C) Autopsy
अवधारणा: Autopsy = मृत्यु का कारण जानने के लिए शव की जाँच (post-mortem)।
हल:
- post-mortem examination → Autopsy।
- Biopsy = जीवित व्यक्ति के ऊतक की जाँच।
- Forensic = अपराध-विज्ञान से जुड़ा; crematorium = शवदाह गृह।
ट्रिक: bio = जीवन → biopsy जीवित पर; autopsy मृत शरीर पर।
उत्तर: (C) Autopsy
Q3717.Select the most appropriate antonym of the word: Amicable
- AAffable
- BTolerant
- CUncongenial
- DGenial
Show answer
Concept: Amicable = friendly, peaceful.
- Opposite: unfriendly → Uncongenial.
- Affable and genial are synonyms of amicable.
- Tolerant = accepting, not the opposite of friendly.
Trick: Look for a negative prefix (un-, in-, dis-) on a friendly word — 'un+congenial' flips the meaning.
Answer: (C) Uncongenial
अवधारणा: Amicable = मैत्रीपूर्ण, सौहार्दपूर्ण।
हल:
- विपरीत: अमैत्रीपूर्ण → Uncongenial।
- Affable, genial — amicable के समानार्थी।
- Tolerant = सहनशील, यह विलोम नहीं है।
ट्रिक: मित्रता वाले शब्द पर 'un-' लगा हो तो वही विलोम — un + congenial।
उत्तर: (C) Uncongenial
Q3718.Choose the correct one-word substitute for:
A speech delivered without preparation
- AMonologue
- BDialogue
- CExtempore
- DOration
Show answer
Concept: Extempore = spoken without any preparation.
- Key phrase: 'without preparation' → extempore.
- Monologue = long speech by one person; dialogue = conversation.
- Oration = formal, usually prepared speech.
Trick: 'Extempore' sounds like 'ex-tempo' = out of time to prepare — think on-the-spot.
Answer: (C) Extempore
अवधारणा: Extempore = बिना तैयारी के तुरंत दिया गया भाषण।
हल:
- मुख्य शब्द 'without preparation' → extempore।
- Monologue = एक व्यक्ति का लंबा भाषण; dialogue = संवाद।
- Oration = औपचारिक, तैयार किया हुआ भाषण।
ट्रिक: स्कूल की 'extempore competition' याद करें — विषय मौके पर मिलता है।
उत्तर: (C) Extempore
Q3719.Change the following sentence into the Active form.
The market's sudden crash is believed to be caused by panic selling traders.
- APanic selling traders believe that the market's sudden crash is caused.
- BPanic selling traders are believed to cause the market's sudden crash.
- CPeople believe that panic selling traders caused the market's sudden crash.
- DThe market believes that panic selling traders caused the sudden crash.
Show answer
Concept: 'X is believed to be…' becomes 'People believe that…' in the active voice.
- 'Is believed' has no doer → add 'People believe that'.
- Inner part: agent 'panic selling traders' becomes subject; verb 'caused'; object 'the market's sudden crash'.
- So the active form opens with 'People believe that' and uses the simple past 'caused'.
Trick: For is said / is believed / is thought — start the active with 'People say/believe/think that'.
Answer: (C) People believe that panic selling traders caused the market's sudden crash.
अवधारणा: 'X is believed to be…' का active रूप — 'People believe that…'।
हल:
- 'is believed' का कर्ता नहीं दिया → 'People believe that' जोड़ें।
- अंदर के भाग में 'panic selling traders' कर्ता, क्रिया 'caused', object 'the market's sudden crash'।
- इसलिए active वाक्य 'People believe that' से शुरू होगा और क्रिया 'caused' होगी।
ट्रिक: is said / is believed / is thought देखते ही active 'People say/believe/think that' से शुरू करें।
उत्तर: (C) People believe that panic selling traders caused the market's sudden crash.
Q3720.Select the option that expresses the given sentence in indirect voice.
The captain said, 'We will be climbing the mountain all day.*
- AThe captain said that they would be climbing the mountain all day.
- BThe captain said that they will be climbing the mountain all day.
- CThe captain said that we would be climbing the mountain all day.
- DThe captain said that they were climbing the mountain all day.
Show answer
Concept: Past reporting verb → back-shift tense; change pronouns to the reporter's view.
- 'will be climbing' → 'would be climbing'.
- 'we' (the captain's group) → 'they'.
- Join with 'that' and remove the inverted commas.
Trick: Check two things only: 'would' ✔ and 'they' ✔ — only A has both.
Answer: (A) The captain said that they would be climbing the mountain all day.
अवधारणा: Reporting verb past में हो तो tense एक कदम पीछे; pronoun reporter के अनुसार बदलें।
हल:
- 'will be climbing' → 'would be climbing'।
- 'we' → 'they'।
- 'that' से जोड़ें और उद्धरण चिह्न हटा दें।
ट्रिक: सिर्फ दो चीज़ें जाँचें — 'would' और 'they'; दोनों केवल A में।
उत्तर: (A) The captain said that they would be climbing the mountain all day.